I refuse to engage in a blog-fight with Andrew Sullivan because he viciously refuses to link to me.

I am above all intrablogicological blogging blogger blogblogwars, as my loyal commenters know. It is only the partisanship of others that causes me to constantly be involved in blog-fights. After all, if everyone would simply agree with me, as they should because my opinions are nonpartisan, then they would have no cause to disagree with what I say. Why is this so hard for them to understand?

Besides, I hate the tawdry, childish namecalling that can so often characterize the blogosphere, the kind of silly namecalling that poisonous little putrid partisan toads like Glenn Greenwald delight in. He writes so badly! His sentences can be very long and are full of many different words. How duh of him!

Greenwald objects to the sensible objection to Andrew Sullivan's constant use of the term "Christianist" on the grounds that sensible Christians might object to it. After all, the term "Islamicists" refers to very bad evil Muslims. The term "Christianist" therefore makes no sense! Christians are not Muslims! Also, Andrew Sullivan makes condescending fun of Mormons for wearing underwear and being governors of Massachussetts and therefore Mormonists. Has he no concept of how insulting that is to Heartland Christians?

What is worse, he even titles a post "The Mormon Question." How tone-deaf can you get! Now, it seems Andrew Sullivan hates Irish Catholics too! Clearly he has no sympathy for the feelings of Irish Catholics. How sad.

I think it is important to remember that words have meanings. Take the word "nonpartisan." That word means that I am right. This is all very clear.

UPDATE: Andrew Sullivan refuses to link to me! What a shocking breach of blogger ethics. Why did he go so far out of his way to pick a Bloggerfightwar with me if he is going to stubbornly refuse to drive up my hit count? This is simply outrageous behavior.