Liberal partisans and their non-arguments.
This blog has been innundated with several new classes of readers lately. This always seems to happen when the reprehensible, vicious partisan Atrios links to Altmouse in a desparate attempt to pump up his artificially inflated hit count. According to SiteMeter, Atrios only gets 10 hits a day from a single user in the Phillipines. I have far more readers then he does!
I run an open forum where all comments are welcome, even critical ones, though these will be deleted. However, I am sick and tired of the non-arguments of posters such as the egregious Nim and his "side-kick" Phila, to whom I refuse to link because they are reprehensible, vicious partisans and I refuse to link to sites like that, ever.
Some of these people should learn what a non-argument is. Of course, it is difficult to explain this difficult concept in a brief blog post or even a law review article. I read many law review articles in Starbucks while I grade last semester's blue books. However, by merely shifting a vowel, it is possible to quickly illustrate the concept of a "nun-argument."
No more need be said. The "arguments" of partisans like Phila and Nim are "lighter than air" and very weak because they emanate from their "habit" of partisan thinking. You can't have a conversation with them!
I hope this settles the issue.
UPDATE: Is it possible I am misunderstanding how SiteMeter works? Somehow, I doubt it.
I run an open forum where all comments are welcome, even critical ones, though these will be deleted. However, I am sick and tired of the non-arguments of posters such as the egregious Nim and his "side-kick" Phila, to whom I refuse to link because they are reprehensible, vicious partisans and I refuse to link to sites like that, ever.
Some of these people should learn what a non-argument is. Of course, it is difficult to explain this difficult concept in a brief blog post or even a law review article. I read many law review articles in Starbucks while I grade last semester's blue books. However, by merely shifting a vowel, it is possible to quickly illustrate the concept of a "nun-argument."
No more need be said. The "arguments" of partisans like Phila and Nim are "lighter than air" and very weak because they emanate from their "habit" of partisan thinking. You can't have a conversation with them!
I hope this settles the issue.
UPDATE: Is it possible I am misunderstanding how SiteMeter works? Somehow, I doubt it.
posted by Ann Altmouse at 2:45 PM
11 Comments:
But Nim and Phila like you, they really like you!
My god, Sister Bertrille's got a fabulous body... I bet she shags like a minx.
I like pictures of nuns only second to pictures of angels. I just ordered an official photo of Supreme Court Justice Alito; I hope he autographs it.
k. ron likes pictures, but I like nonpartisan sculpture. I found this one when I googled baby Jesus. It's so cute!
Dearest Professor,
Your words say "No no," but your beautiful puppet eyelids say "Yes yes!"
You know that we need each other, you and I. I am the yin to your yang. The Souter to your Alito. The Doctor Doom to your Fantastic Four.
If it weren't for cretinous, non-argumentative attorneys like myself, the world would not appreciate how probingly insightful your professoress diva genius is.
You NEED me, Altmouse.
Nim, if you are going to resort to the use of obscene and sexist terms like "yang" I will have no choice but to delete your comments. That is a terrible insult to women of my generation. Shape up!
Please forgive me Dear Blogress, but I wish to address a question to gordo instead of to you.
Dear person gordo, do you know of any of those wonderful sculptures that are angels? Or nuns? Or Supreme Court Justice Alito? I could really get behind some of those.
What is this "googled" thing you talk about? Is it some form of Far Eastern meditation to enhance self-awareness?
I don't understand how yang is offensive. It's an ancient term to discribe the light/dark ,the id/ego. In what context are you using it? Curious minds want to know!
Taradharma,
Surely it can only take a few moments of self-reflection (and depending on your chromosomes, it may indeed be self-reflection) to figure out what this "yang" is. Improve the quality of your comments forthwith!
Dear Prof,
Here is a gathering of distinguished non-partisan constitutional lawyers on the occasion of the release of their report in support of Article 2 powers.
Where were you?
Although vowel-shifting almost borders on *irony*, it is definitely not *partisan.*
For example, merely shifting a few vowels (plus some consonants, but those don't count unless you're some kind of sexist, in which case: shape up!), it is also possible to illustrate that "Alito" and "Scalia" are the same, and they can also be interpreted as "Thomas."
And for those of you addicted to non-arguments, please look in the nearest mirror as soon as possible.
For those who might be considering a career in nun-arguments, get thee to a law review and find an appropriate article on habitual aeronautics.
Post a Comment
<< Home